WEEK3 - INTL 6000 - CLASSMATE PAPER CRITIC PAPER Assignment - 1

WEEK3 - INTL 6000 - CLASSMATE PAPER CRITIC PAPER - Assignment ExampleHowever, it would pay been better in addition leading off with the aid given to the Free Syrian Army, which has fuelled the conflict plain more and made peace even more difficult to attain (Daily Mail.com 1).The literature review also discusses the issue that the divergent authors have formulated and briefly, talks about the authors research orientation. However, it would have been better if the writer had commented on whether the authors line of work statement was clear defined and whether the author had clearly established the relevance of the study to the issue within his literature review. However, the writer does indicate the specific problem and thesis that the author seeks to discuss in their research terms. For example, while discussing the article Intervention and Democracy by Bruno & George, the writer indicates that the authors are discussing the types of interventions that the United States should pursue in the conflict as a third party to achieve democracy in the region. The fact that the results are not sunrise(prenominal) or surprising should have led the writer to comment on ways that the authors would have approached their problem or thesis differently. For example, it would have been better if the writer had apply the USs threat of consequences if the Syrian government did not respect the wills of its people and used chemical weapons (Williams 1).The transition between different authors and articles cover in the literature review is well done. However, while the writer does cover some of the research designs and methodologies used in some studies, it is not done for most of the studies. The writer could also have indicated if the material had been compose to appeal to the readers emotions, rhetorical, or one sided. For instance, it is clear that Gordon Hahns article Russia in 2012 from thawing and Reset to Freeze is biased against the role of Russia in the conflict. The role played by President Putin, which is different from